Clinical characteristics and 12-month outcomes of patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: SARS­CoV­2 infection is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic complications. Thromboembolism is one of the possible causes of myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the characteristics and 12­month clinical outcomes of patients with MINOCA treated before and during the COVID­19 pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of 51 734 patients with acute myocardial infarction registered in the nationwide Polish Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes database in 2019 and 2020. The final study group included 3178 patients with MINOCA. We compared the baseline characteristics, management strategies, and 12­month clinical outcomes of the MINOCA patients treated before (2019) and during the COVID­19 pandemic (2020). RESULTS: The rate of MINOCA was higher in 2019 than in 2020 (6.3% vs 5.9%; P = 0.03). The only difference between the groups was a higher hypercholesterolemia rate before the pandemic (33.9% vs 28.2%; P <0.001). In­hospital stroke was observed more frequently during the pandemic (0% vs 0.3%; P = 0.01), whereas other in­hospital complications were similar between the groups. Most patients were discharged on aspirin (85.6%), a ß­blocker (73.1%), an angiotensin­converting enzyme inhibitor / angiotensin receptor blocker (70.2%), and a statin (62.7%), but only 50.6% of the participants received a P2Y12 inhibitor. There was no difference in 12­month all­cause mortality between the patients with MINOCA treated before and during the pandemic (9.2% vs 11%; P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a lower percentage of MINOCA cases and higher in­hospital stroke rates in the MINOCA patients treated during the COVID­19 pandemic (2020). The possible association between worse clinical outcomes of the MINOCA patients treated during the pandemic and the increased risk for thromboembolic complications of SARS­CoV­2 infection needs further evaluation.

Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality of Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Infection.

Background: The identification of parameters that would serve as predictors of prognosis in COVID-19 patients is very important. In this study, we assessed independent factors of in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients during the second wave of the pandemic. Material and methods: The study group consisted of patients admitted to two hospitals and diagnosed with COVID-19 between October 2020 and May 2021. Clinical and demographic features, the presence of comorbidities, laboratory parameters, and radiological findings at admission were recorded. The relationship of these parameters with in-hospital mortality was evaluated. Results: A total of 1040 COVID-19 patients (553 men and 487 women) qualified for the study. The in-hospital mortality rate was 26% across all patients. In multiple logistic regression analysis, age ≥ 70 years with OR = 7.8 (95% CI 3.17−19.32), p < 0.001, saturation at admission without oxygen ≤ 87% with OR = 3.6 (95% CI 1.49−8.64), p = 0.004, the presence of typical COVID-19-related lung abnormalities visualized in chest computed tomography ≥40% with OR = 2.5 (95% CI 1.05−6.23), p = 0.037, and a concomitant diagnosis of coronary artery disease with OR = 3.5 (95% CI 1.38−9.10), p = 0.009 were evaluated as independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: The relationship between clinical and laboratory markers, as well as the advancement of lung involvement by typical COVID-19-related abnormalities in computed tomography of the chest, and mortality is very important for the prognosis of these patients and the determination of treatment strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Comparison of reorganized versus unaltered cardiology departments during the COVID-19 era: A subanalysis of the COV-HF-SIRIO 6 study.

BACKGROUND: Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, numerous cardiology departments were reorganized to provide care for COVID-19 patients. We aimed to compare the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital admissions and in-hospital mortality in reorganized vs. unaltered cardiology departments. METHODS: The present research is a subanalysis of a multicenter retrospective COV-HF-SIRIO 6 study that includes all patients (n = 101,433) hospitalized in 24 cardiology departments in Poland between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020, with a focus on patients with acute heart failure (AHF). RESULTS: Reduction of all-cause hospitalizations was 50.6% vs. 21.3% for reorganized vs. unaltered cardiology departments in 2020 vs. 2019, respectively (p < 0.0001). Considering AHF alone respective reductions by 46.5% and 15.2% were registered (p < 0.0001). A higher percentage of patients was brought in by ambulance to reorganized vs. unaltered cardiology departments (51.7% vs. 34.6%; p < 0.0001) alongside with a lower rate of self-referrals (45.7% vs. 58.4%; p < 0.0001). The rate of all-cause in-hospital mortality in AHF patients was higher in reorganized than unaltered cardiology departments (10.9% vs. 6.4%; p < 0.0001). After the exclusion of patients with concomitant COVID-19, the mortality rates did not differ significantly (6.9% vs. 6.4%; p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: A greater reduction in hospital admissions in 2020 vs. 2019, higher rates of patients brought by ambulance together with lower rates of self-referrals and higher all-cause in-hospital mortality for AHF due to COVID-19 related deaths were observed in cardiology departments reorganized to provide care for COVID-19 patients vs. unaltered ones.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on acute heart failure admissions and mortality: a multicentre study (COV-HF-SIRIO 6 study).

AIMS: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed the landscape of medical care delivery worldwide. We aimed to assess the influence of COVID-19 pandemic on hospital admissions and in-hospital mortality rate in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) in a retrospective, multicentre study. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020, a total of 101 433 patients were hospitalized in 24 Cardiology Departments in Poland. The number of patients admitted due to AHF decreased by 23.4% from 9853 in 2019 to 7546 in 2020 (P < 0.001). We noted a significant reduction of self-referrals in the times of COVID-19 pandemic accounting 27.8% (P < 0.001), with increased number of AHF patients brought by an ambulance by 15.9% (P < 0.001). The length of hospital stay was overall similar (7.7 ± 2.8 vs. 8.2 ± 3.7 days; P = not significant). The in-hospital all-cause mortality in AHF patients was 444 (5.2%) in 2019 vs. 406 (6.5%) in 2020 (P < 0.001). A total number of AHF patients with concomitant COVID-19 was 239 (3.2% of AHF patients hospitalized in 2020). The rate of in-hospital deaths in AHF patients with COVID-19 was extremely high accounting 31.4%, reaching up to 44.1% in the peak of the pandemic in November 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that the COVID-19 pandemic led to (i) reduced hospital admissions for AHF; (ii) decreased number of self-referred AHF patients and increased number of AHF patients brought by an ambulance; and (iii) increased in-hospital mortality for AHF with very high mortality rate for concomitant AHF and COVID-19.

Assessment of the Consultation Rate with General Practitioners in the Initial Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic affected the functioning of healthcare systems (HSs) in a way that was difficult to foresee earlier. It quickened the introduction of e-medicine, and changed the manner and number of services provided in the open medical setting. Aim: To assess variations in the consultation rate of patients in primary healthcare centers (PHCs) in consecutive months of the pandemic. Method: Data collected from two PHCs located in Olsztyn (Poland) were analyzed retrospectively. Collectively, these two centers provide care for approximately 20,000 inhabitants and perform approximately 100,000 medical services annually. The analysis was based on data covering the period April-July of the years 2010-2020, consisting in total of 337,510 medical services records. Results: A large, statistically significant decrease in the consultation rate (consultation rate understood as the number of individuals seeking consultation in relation to the number of people under care in a given time period) was revealed in each age group in the initial phase of the pandemic. In consecutive months, the approximated consultation rate achieved mean long-term values. Conclusions. The largest reduction in the consultation rate was revealed in the youngest age group, with the smallest occurring in the oldest. In the group of patients older than 65 years of age, the consultation rate after 3 months of the pandemic was the same as before the outbreak. Variations in the consultation rate were independent of the epidemiological situation. During the study, we observed an increased level of the administrative and paperwork activities carried out by PHC physicians.

Assessment of the Consultation Rate with General Practitioners in the Initial Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic affected the functioning of healthcare systems (HSs) in a way that was difficult to foresee earlier. It quickened the introduction of e-medicine, and changed the manner and number of services provided in the open medical setting. Aim: To assess variations in the consultation rate of patients in primary healthcare centers (PHCs) in consecutive months of the pandemic. Method: Data collected from two PHCs located in Olsztyn (Poland) were analyzed retrospectively. Collectively, these two centers provide care for approximately 20,000 inhabitants and perform approximately 100,000 medical services annually. The analysis was based on data covering the period April–July of the years 2010–2020, consisting in total of 337,510 medical services records. Results: A large, statistically significant decrease in the consultation rate (consultation rate understood as the number of individuals seeking consultation in relation to the number of people under care in a given time period) was revealed in each age group in the initial phase of the pandemic. In consecutive months, the approximated consultation rate achieved mean long-term values. Conclusions. The largest reduction in the consultation rate was revealed in the youngest age group, with the smallest occurring in the oldest. In the group of patients older than 65 years of age, the consultation rate after 3 months of the pandemic was the same as before the outbreak. Variations in the consultation rate were independent of the epidemiological situation. During the study, we observed an increased level of the administrative and paperwork activities carried out by PHC physicians.